State v. Meiser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that motion for judgment of acquittal on an affirmative defense may only be granted when no facts are presented upon which reasonable persons could differ
• the 1983 amendment excluding personality disorders intentionally “narrows access to the defense set out in subsection (1)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Meiser
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2024-06-13· cited 8×
• State v. Meiser
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-01-11· cited 5×
• State v. Kyei
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-01-23· cited 3×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-07-10· cited 1×
• State v. Meiser
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-27

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• Tharp v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-04-14· cited 58×
• Beiswenger v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-02-04· cited 16×
• State v. Swanson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-11-10· cited 12×
• State v. Meiser
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-01-21· cited 6×
• State v. Peverieri
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-02-25· cited 3×