Court of Appeals of Kansas· 4/25/2003
State v. Meinert
Citations
- 67 P.3d 850
- 31 Kan. App. 2d 492
- 2003 Kan. App. LEXIS 334
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding criminal threat requires specific intent based on an earlier version of the statute
- criminal threat, [K.S.A. 21-3419(a)], defined as “any threat to . . . [c]ommit violence communicated with intent to terrorize another,” requires “a specific intent such as the intent to terrorize”
- criminal' threat, K.S.A. 21-3419[a], defined as “any threat to . . . [cjommit violence communicated with intent to terrorize another,” requires “a specific intent such as the intent to terrorize”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elliott, Lewis, Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-06-19· cited 56×
- In re C.P.W.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2009-07-24· cited 14×
- In Re the Care & Treatment of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2004-03-12· cited 12×
- State v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-11-12· cited 2×
- In Re CPWSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-07-24
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.