Connecticut Appellate Court· 11/12/2013
State v. Meikle
Citations
- 146 Conn. App. 660
- 79 A.3d 129
- 2013 WL 5916773
- 2013 Conn. App. LEXIS 529
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘‘because [a] determination regarding a trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law, our review is plenary’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]
- trial court incorrectly exercised jurisdiction in denying motion to correct
- trial court incorrectly exercised jurisdiction in denying motion to correct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alvord, Lavine, Robinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-11-28· cited 103×
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-01-30· cited 62×
- State v. CasianoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-05-29· cited 56×
- Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians v. LorinskyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-08-04· cited 13×
- State v. DelgadoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-08-11· cited 9×
- State v. MeikleConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-11-21· cited 9×
- Meikle v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-02-15· cited 2×
- Meikle v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-10-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.