Skip to main content

State v. Meeks

Citations

  • 711 S.E.2d 403
  • 309 Ga. App. 855

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the “elasticity in the theft by taking statute” which allows the state to indict someone for theft by taking, but prove theft by deception
  • affirming grant of special demurrer on a count that was “entirely duplicative” of another count and provided “no additional facts by which it [could] be distinguished from that count”
  • trial court did not err in sustaining special demurrer when State presented no evidence about why an investigating officer failed to ascertain specific dates of offenses allegedly occurring during the two-month period alleged in the indictment
  • The trial court did not err in sustaining the defendant’s special demurrer when the record showed that the State gave no explanation as to why an investigating officer failed to ascertain the dates the offenses allegedly occurred.
  • The trial court did not err in sustaining the defendant’s special demurrer when the record showed that the State gave no explanation as to why an investigating officer failed to ascertain the dates the offenses allegedly occurred.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Mikell, Dillard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.