Skip to main content

State v. Meek

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 2535

Syllabus

The trial court did not err when it overruled appellant's presentence motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. There was no evidence in the record to support appellant's argument that he was misled by his attorney at the plea hearing or that he was confused regarding the sentence he would receive by pleading guilty to aggravated possession of drugs, a felony of the second degree, which required the trial court to sentence him to an indefinite term of incarceration. The trial court reasonably found that appellant's decision to seek withdrawal of his guilty pleas was simply a \change of heart\ and not a sufficient basis upon which to withdraw his guilty pleas. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Donovan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.