New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 3/12/2002

State v. Medina

Citations

793 A.2d 68
349 N.J. Super. 108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding \isolated instances of judicial annoyance or impatience do not warrant the drastic remedy of vitiating an otherwise valid conviction \
discussing State v. States, 44 N.J. 285, 292 (1965), which recognized the State’s discretion regarding which charge to prosecute when faced with overlapping criminal statutes
stating the prosecution has discretion to charge, file, and present matters to a grand jury
\Trial judges are vested with the authority to propound questions to qualify a witness's testimony and to elicit material facts on their own initiative and within their sound discretion.\
\Trial judges are vested with the authority to propound questions to qualify a witness's testimony and to elicit material facts on their A-2033-18T2 6 own initiative and within their sound discretion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Baime, Newman and Fall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.