Skip to main content

State v. Meadows

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 4513

Syllabus

Guilty plea maximum penalty advisement consecutive sentences. Appellant fails to demonstrate that, but for the trial court's erroneous advisement about the maximum penalty of one of the multiple counts he pleaded guilty to, he would have exercised his trial rights. Appellant's consecutive sentences are affirmed because the trial court made the statutory findings for the consecutive sentences and the findings are supported by the record.

Judges: Sheehan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.