State v. Meadows
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 802
Syllabus
Journalize findings nunc pro tunc manifest weight of the evidence rape. The trial court failed to journalize the fact that it suspended Meadows's obligation to pay costs while he was incarcerated in its sentencing journal entry, which can be corrected through a nunc pro tunc entry. Meadows's conviction for rape was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State ex rel. Cruzado v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court· 2006-11-22· cited 371×
- State v. MillerOhio Supreme Court· 2010-11-30· cited 171×
- State ex rel. Worcester v. DonnellonOhio Supreme Court· 1990-02-28· cited 119×
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-21· cited 74×
- State v. KurtzOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-11· cited 49×
- State v. BaileyOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-30· cited 12×
- State v. McNamaraOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-08· cited 6×
- State v. MeadowsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-02· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.