Skip to main content

State v. Meadows

Citations

  • 226 N.W.2d 303
  • 303 Minn. 76
  • 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • comments on defendant’s exercise of marital privilege were erroneous, but not prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Todd, Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.