West Virginia Supreme Court· 6/22/1983

State v. Meadows

Citations

304 S.E.2d 831
172 W. Va. 247
1983 W. Va. LEXIS 543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

evidence must be “manifestly inadequate\ with \consequent injustice” being done to warrant reversal upon insufficiency of evidence
evidence must be \manifestly inadequate\ with \consequent injustice\ being done to warrant reversal upon insufficiency of evidence
clear prejudice and “manifest injustice” must be shown to warrant reversal for improper remarks by the prosecution to the jury
clear prejudice and \manifest injustice\ must be shown to warrant reversal for improper remarks by the prosecution to the jury
\[A]ny lack of specificity with regard to details in an indictment are discoverable upon a proper motion for a bill of particulars.\
sufficiency of bill of particulars is within the sound discretion of the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McHugh, Harshbarger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.