Skip to main content

State v. McQueen

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 3996
  • 118 N.E.3d 1196

Syllabus

Motion to suppress, reasonable suspicion, exclusionary rule. The trial court did not err in granting the appellee's motion to suppress because the officers did not have reasonable suspicion to search and seize the appellee. Any evidence obtained from the unlawful search and seizure of the appellee is subject to the exclusionary rule because it was a result of the unlawful arrest of the appellee.

Judges: Laster Mays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.