Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/22/1972
State v. McPherson
Citations
- 493 P.2d 228
- 208 Kan. 511
- 1972 Kan. LEXIS 468
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Under the provisions of K.S.A. 20-1205 the taking of testimony and the preservation thereof is mandatory and a requisite of jurisdiction.”
- “Under the provisions of K.S.A. 20-1201 all classes of contempts of court must be proceeded against only as prescribed in K.S.A. Chap. 20, Art. 12. Informalities in procedure are not permissible.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaul
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-12-12· cited 31×
- State Ex Rel. Sanborn v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1973-07-14· cited 25×
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1986-06-19· cited 12×
- Hunter v. HaunSupreme Court of Kansas· 1972-07-19· cited 10×
- In Re SeelkeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1984-04-27· cited 7×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.