Skip to main content

State v. McNeil

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 1200

Syllabus

Criminal Law—Sentencing: Restitution & Consecutive Sentence Findings. The trial court did not err when it imposed restitution, because the record showed the trial court considered appellant's present and future ability to pay. The trial court's consecutive sentence findings were harmless error, because the court is only required to give those findings when it actually imposes consecutive sentences at the original sentencing or at a later community control violation hearing.

Judges: Hendrickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.