State v. McMillan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating \[t]he word `may' when used in a statute is generally permissive and operates to confer discretion.\
• stating “[t]he word ‘may’ when used in a statute is generally permissive and operates to confer discretion” (citing Spokane County ex rel. Sullivan v. Glover, 2 Wn.2d 162, 165, 97 P.2d 628 (1940))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Holiday v. City of Moses Lake
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-08-05· cited 15×
• State Of Washington v. Roland Kopp
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-11-09· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nguyen v. STATE HEALTH MED. QUALITY ASSUR.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-08-23· cited 143×
• Nguyen v. Department of Health
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-08-23· cited 137×
• In Re Custody of CCM
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-03-09· cited 41×
• Mecum v. Department of Social & Health Services
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-03-09· cited 40×
• State v. Pray
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-05-24· cited 18×
• State v. Pray
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-07-07· cited 16×
• State v. Ayala
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-09-18· cited 4×