State v. McMannis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because amphetamine and methamphetamine are “two different substances” under § 65-4107(d), the defendant could not be convicted of possessing amphetamine where evidence at trial only established that the defendant possessed methamphetamine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Gary Savaiano, and Gary McPherson and Bill Crummey
  Tenth Circuit· 1988-03-30· cited 125×
• State v. Potts
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-11-17· cited 14×
• State v. Schad
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1990-07-19· cited 8×
• State v. McWilliams
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-08-17· cited 3×
• State v. Warren
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-09-28· cited 2×
• State v. Martens
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-06-29· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Howell & Taylor
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1979-10-27· cited 43×
• State v. Houck
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1986-10-31· cited 37×
• State v. Slansky
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1986-06-13· cited 14×
• State v. Gardner
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1985-05-02· cited 10×
• State v. Jamieson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1971-01-23· cited 10×
• State v. Guillory
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1984-03-13· cited 7×