Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 12/8/1989
State v. McLaughlin
Citations
- 567 A.2d 82
- 1989 Me. LEXIS 308
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court, in concluding no denial of defendant’s right to a speedy trial, found significant that delay in proceeding to trial was caused by withdrawal of two court-appointed attorneys because defendant refused to communicate with them
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKusick, Roberts, Wathen, Glassman, Clifford, Hornby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LeoneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1990-10-05· cited 28×
- State v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1991-05-02· cited 21×
- State v. RippySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1993-05-28· cited 11×
- Dennis F. Winchester v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2023-03-30· cited 10×
- In re Child of Stephen E.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2018-05-22· cited 4×
- In re Stephen E.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2018-05-22· cited 4×
- State v. HunnewellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1991-06-17
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- State v. TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-12-17· cited 231×
- State v. DeLongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1986-02-26· cited 48×
- State v. HindsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-12-11· cited 36×
- State v. WilloughbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1986-04-09· cited 21×
- State v. BeaucheneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1988-04-28· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.