State v. McLaughlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The hearing justice can draw reasonable inferences from the evidence presented to determine whether the defendant violated the terms of his probation.” (quoting State v. Seamans, 935 A.2d 618, 621-22 (R.I. 2007))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth, Aplt v. Koch, A.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-30· cited 88×
• State v. Christodal
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2008-05-07· cited 24×
• Accetta v. Provencal
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2009-01-12· cited 18×
• State v. Lopez
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2008-03-26· cited 14×
• State v. Lancellotta
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2012-01-05· cited 9×
• State v. Horton
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2009-06-05· cited 5×
• State v. Michael Giard
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2017-03-24· cited 4×
• State v. Curtis Isom
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2013-04-11· cited 2×
• State v. Maloney
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2008-05-23· cited 2×
• State v. Murray
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2011-06-29· cited 1×
• State v. Juan Gibson
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2015-11-04
• State v. Stephen Mulcahey
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2019-11-21
• State v. Luis M. Molina
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2021-05-26