State v. McKnight
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 3314
Syllabus
The trial court's sentencing decision was not contrary to law where the record reflects the trial court considered the purposes and principles of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11 as well as the factors listed in R.C. 2929.12. In this case, appellant's lengthy criminal history and lack of remorse were factors considered in imposing the maximum sentence. The fact that the trial court chose to weigh various sentencing factors differently than how appellant would have weighed them does not mean the trial court erred in imposing sentence.
Judges: Ringland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Rahab (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-04-18· cited 111×
- State v. DinkaOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-14· cited 105×
- State v. Brandenburg (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-05-17· cited 73×
- State v. JuliousOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-05· cited 69×
- State v. HarpOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-11· cited 60×
- State v. StamperOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-23· cited 34×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-28· cited 2×
- State v. HunterOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-30· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.