Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/18/2022

State v. McKinney

Citations

2022 Ohio 849

Syllabus

SENTENCING — R.C. 2929.14 — CONSECUTIVE-SENTENCES — FINDINGS: The trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences was proper under R.C. 2929.14 when the record supported the trial court's finding that defendant's history of criminal conduct demonstrated that consecutive sentences were necessary to protect the public from future crime by defendant.

Judges: Bock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Gill
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-24· cited 8×
State v. Galinari
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-27· cited 7×
State v. Mosley
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-09-24· cited 3×
State v. Olverson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-27· cited 2×
State v. Thompson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-09-17· cited 1×
State v. Kirkland
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-02-20

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
State v. Saxon
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-03-20· cited 624×
State v. Hessler
Ohio Supreme Court· 2000-09-27· cited 189×
State v. Grate (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-10· cited 117×
State v. Marshall
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-17· cited 12×
State v. Hayes
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-18· cited 8×
State v. White
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-12· cited 8×
State v. Bronson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-19· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.