Missouri Court of Appeals· 1/10/1989
State v. McKinney
Citations
- 763 S.W.2d 702
- 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 35
- 1989 WL 711
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that trial court erred in permitting witness to use police report to “refresh” his recollection even though witness had testified “clearly and unhesitatingly” to events at issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crandall, Grimm, Simon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 3,038×
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,335×
- Pope v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1987-05-04· cited 672×
- State v. KoonceMissouri Court of Appeals· 1987-05-05· cited 40×
- State v. ReppSupreme Court of Missouri· 1980-08-18· cited 28×
- State v. ThomsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1985-12-17· cited 15×
- State v. ColeMissouri Court of Appeals· 1986-03-18· cited 13×
- State v. McKinneySupreme Court of Missouri· 1988-07-26· cited 11×
- State Ex Rel. Pini v. MorelandMissouri Court of Appeals· 1984-12-28· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.