State v. McKenzie
Citations
- 248 N.E.3d 914
- 2024 Ohio 2841
Syllabus
Per Mayle, J., defendant \has tested positive as a carrier\ of HIV and knowingly engaged in sex with victim without first disclosing this, so conviction under R.C. 2903.11(B)(1) was not against weight or sufficiency of evidence. Statute is rationally related to State's legitimate interest in curbing transmittal of HIV and does not violate equal protection. Although defendant was incapable of transmitting HIV, matter presents broader policy issue for legislature. Statute regulates conduct, not speech
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 2,387×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
- Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.Supreme Court· 2006-03-06· cited 944×
- Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court· 1949-04-04· cited 874×
- State v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court· 1978-07-26· cited 274×
- United States v. EichmanSupreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 216×
- Am. Assn. of Univ. Professors, Cent. State Univ. Chapter v. Cent. State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court· 1999-10-20· cited 49×
- State v. BeanOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-12· cited 26×
- State v. BatistaOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-06· cited 6×
- Maxwell Todd Howton v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2021-02-24· cited 3×
- Maynard v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.