State v. McIntyre

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, when a Supreme Court decision changed the applicable law, the proper course on appeal was to reverse and remand for reconsideration of the suppression motion in light of the changed law
• requiring a legal point to be “obvious” to qualify for plain error review
• requiring a legal point to be “obvious” to qualify for plain error review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Deatley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-15· cited 2×
• State v. Russin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-08-28
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-16

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ehly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
• State v. Rodgers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-02-11· cited 194×
• State v. Terry
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-12-28· cited 88×
• State v. Arreola-Botello
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2019-11-15· cited 82×
• State v. Kamph
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-05-22· cited 16×
• State v. Soto-Navarro
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-02-10· cited 14×
• State v. Stevens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2018-12-06· cited 13×
• State v. Hallam
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-09· cited 12×
• State v. Payne
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-04-14· cited 9×
• State v. Kilgore
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-01-09· cited 8×
• State v. Sexton
  Washington County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-05-04· cited 6×
• State v. Calvert
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-07-25· cited 4×