State v. McGowan
Citations
- 201 N.E.3d 503
- 2022 Ohio 4124
Syllabus
On remand, application to reopen denied where appellant's claim of unconstitutionality of Reagan Tokes law does not have a reasonable probability of success. ODRC does not have a direct, personal, substantial pecuniary interest in holding a prisoner beyond his or her release date. Thus, the Reagan Tokes law does not create a conflict of interest that violates due process.
Judges: Pietrykowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court· 1927-03-14· cited 2,714×
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court· 1972-11-14· cited 834×
- State v. Maddox (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-03-16· cited 99×
- State v. SheppardOhio Supreme Court· 2001-04-11· cited 68×
- State v. MaddoxOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-30· cited 52×
- State v. StensonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-17· cited 34×
- State v. EatonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-15· cited 23×
- Adrian Caliste v. Harry CantrellFifth Circuit· 2019-08-29· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.