Skip to main content

State v. McGill

Citations

  • 51 Kan. App. 2d 92
  • 340 P.3d 515
  • 2015 Kan. App. LEXIS 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Our [L]egislature has now made its intent clear—the date of the defendant's probation violation controls whether the intermediate sanction provisions of K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 22-3716[c] apply.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burgess, Hill, McAnany

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.