Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1/9/2015
State v. McGill
Citations
- 51 Kan. App. 2d 92
- 340 P.3d 515
- 2015 Kan. App. LEXIS 2
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \Our [L]egislature has now made its intent clear—the date of the defendant's probation violation controls whether the intermediate sanction provisions of K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 22-3716[c] apply.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burgess, Hill, McAnany
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- State v. GumforySupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-06-09· cited 385×
- Miami County Board of Commissioners v. Kanza Rail-Trails Conservancy, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2011-06-10· cited 78×
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-10-31· cited 49×
- State v. BillingsCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2002-02-08· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.