District Court of Appeal of Florida· 11/8/2013
State v. McGill
Citations
- 125 So. 3d 343
- 2013 WL 5950827
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17866
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that information concerning consumable items like narcotics may become stale sooner than for nonconsuma-ble items like videotapes
- recognizing that information concerning consumable items like narcotics may become stale sooner than for nonconsumable items like videotapes
- stating that the defendant’s history of drug-related offenses provided additional support for the search warrant
- stating that the defendant's history of drug-related offenses provided additional support for the search warrant
- information is not stale if there is a basis to believe that evidence is still on the premises
- “The rationale behind the good faith exception is that the exclusionary rule ‘is designed to deter police misconduct rather than to punish the errors of judges and magistrates.’ ” (quoting Leon, 468 U.S. at 916)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Evander, Griffin, Lawson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Christopher L. Carpenter v. State of Florida – Revised OpinionSupreme Court of Florida· 2017-11-02· cited 9×
- Sanchez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-07-23· cited 5×
- Castro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-07-14· cited 1×
- State v. Scott B. HaywardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-31
- Russ v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-02-05
- STATE OF FLORIDA vs MELVIN ERNEST REDHEADDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-06-10
- STATE OF FLORIDA v. ALVIN VIANI FREEMAN, I I IDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-01-05
- STATE OF FLORIDA v. GUILLERMO RODRIGUEZ LOPEZDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-01-19
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-04-04· cited 599×
- Leonard Jerome Bastida v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, La. State PenitentiaryFifth Circuit· 1974-01-14· cited 122×
- Schmitt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-06-13· cited 30×
- Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-14· cited 25×
- Hudson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-02-27· cited 19×
- Montgomery v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-18· cited 13×
- State v. FelixDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-06· cited 13×
- State v. WattDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-05· cited 13×
- Rand v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-03-14· cited 10×
- Jenkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-25· cited 9×
- State v. EnsticeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-11· cited 8×
- State v. PaigeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-21· cited 7×
- State v. SabourinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-21· cited 7×
- State v. HowardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-24· cited 6×
- State v. SiegelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-02· cited 6×
- State v. GrossDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-13· cited 6×
- State v. HarrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-23· cited 6×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-14· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.