Skip to main content

State v. McGill

Citations

  • 125 So. 3d 343
  • 2013 WL 5950827
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17866

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that information concerning consumable items like narcotics may become stale sooner than for nonconsuma-ble items like videotapes
  • recognizing that information concerning consumable items like narcotics may become stale sooner than for nonconsumable items like videotapes
  • stating that the defendant’s history of drug-related offenses provided additional support for the search warrant
  • stating that the defendant's history of drug-related offenses provided additional support for the search warrant
  • information is not stale if there is a basis to believe that evidence is still on the premises
  • “The rationale behind the good faith exception is that the exclusionary rule ‘is designed to deter police misconduct rather than to punish the errors of judges and magistrates.’ ” (quoting Leon, 468 U.S. at 916)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Evander, Griffin, Lawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.