State v. McGill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was error to call defendant an “addict” where there was no competent evidence that he had used drugs habitually or had been convicted of a drag offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bolton
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-13· cited 326×
• Gaston v. Hunter
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-08-29· cited 110×
• State v. Treadaway
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-07-11· cited 68×
• State v. Smith
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1979-07-13· cited 55×
• Tramutola v. Bortone
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1973-05-07· cited 28×
• State v. Altman
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-03-18· cited 23×
• State v. Rhodes
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-02-10· cited 13×
• State v. Rodgers
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-03-19· cited 10×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-03-15· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Narten
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1965-10-28· cited 60×
• State v. Owen
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1963-10-17· cited 50×
• State v. Griffin
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1965-10-08· cited 45×
• State v. Coey
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1957-03-19· cited 39×
• Moore v. Bolin
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1950-07-15· cited 31×
• State v. Lovell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1965-03-03· cited 21×
• State v. Smith
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-06-17· cited 9×
• State v. Stracuzzi
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1955-10-31· cited 5×