State v. McFerron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• State may not be required to proceed with less than 12 jurors
• manifest necessity satisfied, although trial court had alternative, under the law at the time, of proceeding with 11 jurors; the state was not required to pro- ceed with fewer than the jury of 12 to which it was entitled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gorwell
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-07-19· cited 10×
• State Ex Rel. Wark v. Freerksen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-02-25· cited 4×
• State v. Swett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-01-06· cited 2×
• LESTENKOF v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2010-04-23· cited 1×
• State v. Dykstra
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-09