State v. McFeeture
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 801
Syllabus
Postconviction relief hearing substantive grounds abuse of discretion due process Brady violation possession false testimony credibility res judicata. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing a petition for postconviction relief without a hearing. Appellant did not set forth credible operative facts to establish substantive grounds for relief where the state was not in possession of the documents and there was nothing to suggest that the state knowingly used false testimony to obtain a conviction.
Judges: S. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
- Robert Glen Coe, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1999-02-23· cited 698×
- State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-26· cited 691×
- United States v. John David Davis, Robert Lee Anderson, Opry Felton Lowe, Ronnie Berg MillsEleventh Circuit· 1986-04-28· cited 63×
- State ex rel. Madsen v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 2005-09-07· cited 25×
- State v. CurryOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-26· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.