State v. McFarland
Citations
- 60 Wash. 98
- 110 P. 792
- 1910 Wash. LEXIS 1015
Syllabus
<p>Constitutional Law — Class Legislation — Hotels — Inspection —Classification. Rem. & Bal. Code, §§ 6030-6049, providing for the inspection of inns, hotels, and public lodging houses having ten or more rooms does not provide an unreasonable classification and does not violate the constitutional prohibitions against class legislation, the deprivation of property without due process of law, the delegation of legislative powers, or the invasion of private rights.</p> <p>Constitutional Law — Imprisonment for Debt — Hotels — Payment of Inspection Fee. Rem. & Bal. Code, § 6046, making it a misdemeanor, punishable by fine or imprisonment, for a hotel keeper to refuse to pay the annual fee for hotel inspection, violates Const., art. 1, § 17, forbidding imprisonment for debt.</p> <p>Statutes — Partial Invalidity — Effect. The constitutionality of § 6146, Rem. & Bal. Code, providing imprisonment for failure to pay the hotel inspection fee, does not affect the validity of the balance of the act providing for the inspection of inns and hotels.</p>
Judges: Crow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Shapiro Bros. Shoe Co. v. Lewiston-Auburn Shoeworkers Protective Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1974-05-28· cited 56×
- State v. Bowen & Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1915-06-09· cited 42×
- State v. EnloeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-03-12· cited 30×
- Adams v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court· 1958-02-27· cited 30×
- O'CONNELL v. ConteWashington Supreme Court· 1969-06-19· cited 27×
- Bronson v. SyversonWashington Supreme Court· 1915-11-22· cited 26×
- State v. SomervilleWashington Supreme Court· 1912-03-26· cited 21×
- Sherman Clay & Co. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1924-12-16· cited 20×
- Price v. Evergreen Cemetery Co. of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1960-12-08· cited 19×
- City of Seattle v. SeeWashington Supreme Court· 1965-11-24· cited 17×
- State v. HartWashington Supreme Court· 1923-07-13· cited 17×
- Ex Parte SmallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1950-07-26· cited 12×
- Turner v. State Ex Rel. GruverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-10-27· cited 12×
- Record Publishing Co. v. MonsonWashington Supreme Court· 1923-02-14· cited 10×
- State v. BartosArizona Supreme Court· 1967-02-10· cited 6×
- Grave v. KittleIndiana Court of Appeals· 1951-11-28· cited 5×
- State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court· 1943-03-16· cited 4×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1887-01-17· cited 460×
- State v. GarbroskiSupreme Court of Iowa· 1900-05-19· cited 48×
- Sisson v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1905-07-13· cited 44×
- Bailey v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1901-04-18· cited 43×
- State v. MitchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1902-12-09· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.