State v. McElveen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “it is not the province of appellate courts to decide moot questions, disconnected from the granting of actual relief or from the determination of which no practical relief can follow” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• “it is not the province of appellate courts to decide moot questions, disconnected from the granting of actual relief or from the determination of which no practical relief can follow” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• “it is not the province of appellate courts to decide moot questions, disconnected from the granting of actual relief or from the determination of which no practical relief can follow” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Massey v. TOWN OF BRANFORD
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-12-22· cited 14×
• Smith v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-04-02· cited 13×
• State v. Henderson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-08-02· cited 11×
• McKenna v. Delente
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-08-10· cited 10×
• State v. Bree
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-06-05· cited 8×
• State v. Reddy
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-04-24· cited 6×
• State v. McElveen
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-01-05· cited 3×
• State v. McElveen
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-11-01· cited 3×
• Bingham v. Department of Public Works
  Connecticut Superior Court· 2009-11-12· cited 2×
• McCullough v. Rocky Hill
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2026-05-19