Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/22/2015
State v. McDonald
Citations
- 412 S.C. 133
- 771 S.E.2d 840
- 2015 S.C. LEXIS 170
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the State's invitation to find a trial court's limiting instruction curative of a Confrontation Clause violation
- rejecting the State's invitation to find a trial court's limiting instruction curative of a Confrontation Clause violation
- finding a nontestifying codefendant's confession insufficiently redacted by replacing a defendant's name with the phrase, \another person\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kittredge, Toal, Pleicones, Beatty, Hearn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 2,670×
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1972-03-21· cited 1,324×
- Gray v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1998-03-09· cited 723×
- State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-20· cited 352×
- State v. HolderSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-05-04· cited 49×
- State v. BellamySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-08-10· cited 46×
- State v. HensonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-01-22· cited 10×
- State v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-09-12· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.