State v. McDonald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no constitutional right to collaterally attack a prior conviction unless it was obtained in violation of the right to counsel
• ex parte order extending the defendant’s probation did not violate due process; the extension of probation is not equivalent to the “grievous loss” of liberty arising from probation revocation proceedings
• no Sixth Amendment right to counsel on a motion to extend probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Collins v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-08-21· cited 43×
• State v. Gordon
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-04-18· cited 36×
• People v. Minor
  California Court of Appeal· 2010-10-08· cited 14×
• People v. Conner
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2006-05-04· cited 6×
• State v. Key
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-04-18· cited 1×