State v. McDonald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a trial court may consider a defendant’s false testimony as an aggravator because it is distinct from refusal to admit guilt
• finding it permissible to aggravate a sentence based on 5 STATE v. DAGENAIS Decision of the Court perjurious testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Henderson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-11-19· cited 29×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-08-10· cited 1×
• State v. Robertson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-03-06· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Pearce
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
• United States v. Grayson
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 708×
• State v. Holder
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-10-15· cited 61×
• Oscar Poteet v. William Fauver, Warden, New Jersey State Prison
  Third Circuit· 1975-05-07· cited 57×
• State v. McCutcheon
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-07-18· cited 31×
• State v. Lask
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-04-26· cited 12×
• State v. Holder
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-04-21· cited 4×