State v. McDonald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is interesting to note that statutorily our state has not defined an ‘accomplice,’ the matter having been left to the decisions of the courts, text writers, etc. ...” (citing State v. Wade, 66 Utah 267, 241 P. 838 (1925
• “It is interesting to note that statutorily our state has not defined an ‘accomplice,’ the matter having been left to the decisions of the courts, text writers, etc. ...” (citing State v. Wade, 66 Utah 267, 241 P. 838 (1925); State v. Coroles, 74 Utah 94, 277 P. 203 (1929))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Chaney
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1999-10-28· cited 12×
• State v. Boetger
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1975-02-20· cited 6×
• State v. Carter
  Utah Supreme Court· 1972-05-11

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Olsen
  Utah Supreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 1×