State v. McDaniel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the intervention of third parties does not preclude a finding of intent for first-degree assault where a trigger-pulling event is otherwise imminent
• finding that use of the “n”-word was highly probative because the defendant yelled the word in threats to the potential victim and it demonstrated the defendant’s “acute animosity toward the victim and his clear motive and intent to do harm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Missouri v. Blaec James Lammers
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2016-02-09· cited 141×
• State v. Speaks
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2009-09-08· cited 22×
• State v. Gilbert
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-10-24· cited 11×
• State v. Thomas
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-11-18· cited 8×
• State v. Robinson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2009-09-15· cited 6×
• McDaniel v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-10-26
• STATE OF MISSOURI v. BLAEC JAMES LAMMERS
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2015-03-31

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Baker
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2003-04-01· cited 83×
• State Ex Rel. Verweire v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2007-01-30· cited 26×
• State v. Hopson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2005-05-17· cited 20×
• State v. Miller
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-09-18· cited 19×
• State v. Taylor
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-02-13· cited 9×
• State v. Johnson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-09-13· cited 7×