· 4/7/2023
State v. McCurty
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1158
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in overruling appellant's motion to suppress statements made following a warrantless arrest. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]hen we are faced with both statutory and constitutional questions, we No. 21-1042 81 must prioritize resolving the statutory issues if doing so would prevent us from engaging in unnecessary constitu- tional analysis,” particularly when the challenged statute is a state statute.
- “[W]hen we No. 21-1042 81 are faced with both statutory and constitutional questions, we must prioritize resolving the statutory issues if doing so would prevent us from engaging in unnecessary constitu- tional analysis,” particularly when the challenged statute is a state statute.
- certifying statutory question to Indiana Supreme Court
- certifying statutory question to Indiana Supreme Court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.