State v. McCrimmon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the court sent the holdout juror “a clear message that being undecided was unacceptable”
• calling knowledge of the jury’s numerical division “an important factor when considering the totality of the circumstances”
• “Disclosing the numerical division will not always indicate a coerced verdict.”
• under totality of the circumstances test, trial court abused its discretion by denying the motion for a mistrial when juror was singled out as lone dissenter and had ex parte discussion with trial court where trial court told juror that an undecided verdict was unacceptable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).