Supreme Court of Minnesota· 10/27/1978
State v. McCormick
Citations
- 273 N.W.2d 624
- 1978 Minn. LEXIS 1184
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- criminal cases “not subject to the same flexibility enjoyed by the more elastic rules governing extraterritorial jurisdiction in civil cases”
- “Defendant constitutionally and historically can only be tried in the district where the crime occurred, a right which experience demonstrates is designed to further the ends of justice.”
- despite statute specifically providing for this type of jurisdiction, court refused to vary from strict common law rule against extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Otis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Max Weisberg v. State of MinnesotaEighth Circuit· 1994-08-30· cited 48×
- State v. VueSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-04-27· cited 35×
- Rios v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 32×
- People v. CarusoIllinois Supreme Court· 1987-12-21· cited 32×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-04-01· cited 29×
- State v. SimionSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-03-13· cited 28×
- Sykes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-05-26· cited 27×
- Wheat v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1987-03-27· cited 26×
- Trindle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-16· cited 21×
- Howells v. McKibbenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-06-08· cited 19×
- VasquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-02-09· cited 19×
- State v. RossbachSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-01-25· cited 17×
- State v. DoyleIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-04-01· cited 15×
- State v. KaneSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1993-06-09· cited 15×
- State v. AmorosoCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1999-03-04· cited 13×
- People v. CarusoAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-02-26· cited 12×
- State v. DoyenSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-03-15· cited 11×
- Hageseth v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-05-21· cited 10×
- State v. AussieCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-06-03· cited 7×
- State of Minnesota v. Miranda Lynn JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-08-26· cited 4×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Zablocki v. RedhailSupreme Court· 1978-01-18· cited 1,224×
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1912-06-10· cited 844×
- Johnston v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1956-05-21· cited 112×
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-12-20· cited 17×
- State v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-04-19· cited 15×
- Poole v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1973-06-29· cited 13×
- State Ex Rel. Conn v. Board of Trustees of Wisconsin Retirement FundWisconsin Supreme Court· 1969-10-31· cited 10×
- State v. MuellerWisconsin Supreme Court· 1969-10-28· cited 8×
- Olsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-05-15· cited 8×
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1966-12-20· cited 7×
- State v. StickneySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1912-05-31· cited 3×
- In re RosdeitscherE.D. Virginia· 1888-01-03· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.