State v. McConnell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing the difference between the prosecutor’s and a witness’s use of the term “victim”
• one witness’s one-time use of “victim” to describe a complaining witness was harmless in a bench trial because it was a sin- gle statement, it was minor in the context of the whole trial, and the trial court did not rely on it in making its speaking credibility assessment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Curry v. Highberger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-06-07· cited 9×
• State v. Avdeyev
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-02-10· cited 8×
• State v. Kehoe
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-10-30· cited 3×
• Williams v. Laney
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-07-20· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
• State v. Rogers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 302×
• State v. Sperou
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2019-06-06· cited 120×
• State v. Pitt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-10-18· cited 80×
• State v. Simon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-11-15· cited 34×
• Hanfelder v. GEICO Indem. Co.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-05-22· cited 3×