Supreme Court of Vermont· 9/9/1909
State v. McClellan
Citations
- 82 Vt. 361
- 73 A. 993
- 1909 Vt. LEXIS 300
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- check payable to holder, though unendorsed, could be the subject of larceny, and its value would be the amount it represented
- the value of a stolen check is its face amount because that is the amount it was worth to the victim
- value of check is the amount it represents if the check is good
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Munson, Powees, Rowell, Watson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Felkner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-11-24· cited 77×
- People v. MarquesSupreme Court of Colorado· 1974-03-11· cited 63×
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-07-02· cited 46×
- Miller v. Merchants BankSupreme Court of Vermont· 1980-04-08· cited 32×
- State v. EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1984-01-26· cited 29×
- Bigbee v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1977-06-30· cited 26×
- Medley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-05-27· cited 22×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1998-03-06· cited 17×
- Tillery v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals· 1968-04-02· cited 5×
- State v. LongNebraska Court of Appeals· 1994-05-17· cited 5×
- State v. HarrisLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1997-03-05· cited 5×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.