Skip to main content

State v. McCallum

Citations

  • 21 Kan. App. 2d 40
  • 895 P.2d 1258
  • 1995 Kan. App. LEXIS 85

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • construing language now found in K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 21-6820 to hold defendant could not appeal sentencing judge's decision to run sentences consecutive; noting rule of construction \may be applied to assist in determining actual legislative intent which is not otherwise manifest\
  • court does not have jurisdiction over consecutive nature of sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pierron, Rulon, Becker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.