State v. MC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An unambiguous statute is not subject to judicial construction.” (citing State v. Watson, 146 Wn.2d 947, 954-55, 51 P.3d 66 (2002))
• \An unambiguous statute is not subject to judicial construction.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. SSY
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-05-27· cited 4×
• State v. S.S.Y.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-05-27· cited 4×
• State v. MOHAMOUD
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-01-31· cited 1×
• State of Washington v. I.A.S.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-12-01

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Watson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2002-07-25· cited 208×
• In Re MB
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-07-10· cited 69×
• In re the Interest of M.B.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-07-10· cited 67×
• State v. C.R.H.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-30· cited 7×