State v. Mayo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the expression of one thing in a statute implies the exclusion of another, especially when a thing is provided in one part of the statute and omitted in another

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. William Edic
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2017-01-31· cited 19×
• State v. Arthur Kardonsky
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2016-06-14· cited 11×
• Marty May Smith v. The State of Wyoming
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2021-02-12· cited 6×
• State of New Hampshire v. Steven P. Collins
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2015-07-02· cited 5×
• Kelly Sanborn, Trustee of the 428 Lafayette, LLC Realty Trust & A. v. 428 Lafayette, LLC & A. Andrew Cotrupi v. 428 Lafayette, LLC & A
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2016-02-18· cited 3×
• State v. Vic Washington
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2016-04-01· cited 2×
• State v. Shea
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2024-01-19

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Etienne
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2011-12-21· cited 47×
• State v. Hull
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-07-21· cited 45×
• Appeal of the Local Government Center, Inc. & a .
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2014-01-10· cited 34×
• State v. Germain
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2013-11-05· cited 34×
• State v. Cook
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1999-05-26· cited 22×
• State v. Vassar
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2006-11-21· cited 14×
• State v. Connor
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-12-14· cited 13×
• State v. Hebert
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-01-29· cited 10×
• State v. Long
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2011-01-13· cited 2×