State v. Mayland
Citations
- 969 N.W.2d 159
- 2022 ND 9
Syllabus
The statutory remedy provided in N.D.C.C. § 39-20-01(a) is limited to administrative proceedings where the driver refused to take a chemical test. Regardless of whether a driver was arrested, the statutory exclusionary rule does not apply in this case, a criminal proceeding where the driver took the chemical test. Issues not raised at the district court will not be considered for the first time on appeal.
Judges: Jensen, Jon J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BeilkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-08-19· cited 31×
- State v. KensmoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-12-05· cited 21×
- State v. WhitmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-10-22· cited 17×
- City of Grand Forks v. BarendtNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-12-06· cited 6×
- State v. PouliotNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-06-29· cited 4×
- Bearce v. Yellowstone Energy DevelopmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-08-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.