Skip to main content

State v. Mayes

Citations

  • 854 S.W.2d 638
  • 1993 Tenn. LEXIS 186

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the indictment combined with the record would prevent subsequent prosecution for a drug sale at the time and place in the indictment despite the variance regarding the purchaser
  • holding that the indictment along with the record prevented a subsequent prosecution for a drug sale at the time and place identified in the indictment despite the variance as to the identity of the purchaser
  • a variance was not material when the indictment specified one purchaser of narcotics but the proof established a different purchaser

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Drowota, Reid, O'Brien, Daughtrey, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.