District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/30/1988
State v. Maya
Citations
- 529 So. 2d 1282
- 1988 WL 89241
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- probable cause found where known informant gave police information and police independently observed conduct consistent with drug transaction and content of tip
- “[T]he determination of probable cause does not turn on whether an innocent explanation can possibly be conjured up from what are obviously incriminating circumstances. Rather, it is dependent on what a realistic view of the facts justifies or requires.”
- police observation combined with informant’s tip justified probable cause conclusion
- anonymous tip plus officers’ observations supplied probable cause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Baskin and Ferguson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Revels v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-27· cited 33×
- State v. RussellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-08-23· cited 33×
- In Interest of JHDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-13· cited 11×
- State v. CaicedoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-10· cited 10×
- Tracton v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-22· cited 9×
- State v. EadyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-02-07· cited 5×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-14· cited 5×
- State v. SampsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-19· cited 4×
- State v. MitchellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-02· cited 3×
- State v. C.J.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-31· cited 2×
- Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-15· cited 2×
- Bell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-17· cited 1×
- Hilton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-02-07· cited 1×
- State v. HesterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-27· cited 1×
- Janjua v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-12· cited 1×
- Holloman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-18· cited 1×
- Amador v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-03-21
- Lobo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-11-08
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court· 1964-11-23· cited 5,133×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court· 1988-05-16· cited 1,059×
- International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers Pension Plan v. ShawSupreme Court· 1985-06-03· cited 155×
- United States v. Patrick H. DavisD.C. Circuit· 1972-03-16· cited 144×
- Angulo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-04-01· cited 87×
- State v. OliverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-03-13· cited 75×
- United States v. One 1979 Porsche Coupe, Vin 9289200514, Clarence Lee McDowell Claimant-AppellantEleventh Circuit· 1983-07-18· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-06· cited 59×
- Smith v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1987-09-28· cited 58×
- P.L.R. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-07-19· cited 47×
- State v. DelmonacoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-08-28· cited 44×
- Caplan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-08-18· cited 38×
- State v. ProferaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-10-09· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.