Skip to main content

State v. May

Citations

  • 257 Or. App. 375
  • 306 P.3d 759
  • 2013 WL 3353995
  • 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 820

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the factfinder is not required to accept a defendant’s alternative, less incriminating explanation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Ortega, Sercombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.