Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/3/2013
State v. May
Citations
- 257 Or. App. 375
- 306 P.3d 759
- 2013 WL 3353995
- 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 820
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the factfinder is not required to accept a defendant’s alternative, less incriminating explanation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Ortega, Sercombe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 277×
- Tose v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N. A.Supreme Court· 1981-10-13· cited 29×
- State v. BooneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-06-06· cited 10×
- State v. BooneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-10-17· cited 9×
- State v. McAteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-08-31· cited 8×
- State v. BARANOVICHCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-03-02· cited 7×
- State v. BARANOVICHOregon Supreme Court· 2011-07-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.