Missouri Court of Appeals· 3/5/2002

State v. May

Citations

71 S.W.3d 177
2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 424
2002 WL 337723

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

granting plain-error review of the defendant's sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim because whether the State met its burden to present a prima facie case sufficient to sustain a conviction on the charged offense affects a defendant's substantial rights
granting plain-error review of the defendant’s sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim because whether the State met its burden to present a prima facie case sufficient to sustain a conviction on the charged offense affects a defendant’s substantial rights
“[a]n accomplice is one who, before or during the commission of a crime, intentionally and knowingly aids or encourages the commission of a crime”
conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver as an accomplice overturned, where the state merely demonstrated the defendant was present in a house in which others possessed marijuana

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ulrich, Breckenridge, Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.