State v. Max Misch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to determine which trigger theory applied because summary judgment could be decided based on the plain language of the policy
• collecting Florida cases showing that “‘traditional principles of subrogation will not support a reimbursement of defense costs in favor of someone who has the independent contractual duty, to pay all such expenses,’ ” such as an insurer
• collecting Florida cases showing that “‘traditional principles of subrogation will not support a reimbursement of defense costs in favor of someone who has the independent contractual duty to pay all such expenses,’ ” such as an insurer
• insurer had no duty to indemnify where the evidence established that damage occurred after the expiration of the policy and the policy provided coverage for damage which “occurs during the policy period”
• affirming entry of summary judgment in coverage dispute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).