State v. Maupin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “extending the term Victim’ to include a county seeking reimbursement for extradition costs would strain the commonly accepted meaning of the word Victim’ ”
• \ extending the term `victim' to include a county seeking reimbursement for extradition costs would strain the commonly accepted meaning of the word `victim \
• no restitution under A.R.S. § 13-604.C to the state for prosecution expenses
• state not victim entitled to recoup costs of prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Payne
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-07-24· cited 40×
• State v. Guilliams
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-05-28· cited 31×
• State v. French
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-05-01· cited 27×
• State v. Cawyer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-07-29· cited 19×
• State v. Guadagni
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-02-29· cited 16×
• State v. Ryyth
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-04-18· cited 9×
• State v. Watson
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2011-02-09· cited 8×
• State v. Farnsworth
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-01-31· cited 1×
• State of Arizona v. Payne Nelson Daniels
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-07-24
• State of Arizona v. Donald Allen Guadagni
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-02-29
• State of Arizona v. Clayton M. Guilliams
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-05-28
• State Of Washington v. Kristina Cawyer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-07-29